Advertisements
 

The Stabby Arias Penalty Phase Retrial- Ohhhh Somebody Is Going To Hell Edition

Really, you don’t turn your phone off in court Cha Cha?

Todays post is brought to you by the letters S, I, and A.

Hai everybody. It’s me, your law professor/Dean of Fuckery/doctor of doctoring/sarcasm expert/researcher extraordinaire/Queen of the region of Mean. I spent the day taking notes. Notes, and notes and notes. I think I may have carpel tunnel syndrome (I don’t have documentation for that.) I learned a lot of things today. The most important things I learned today were to always keep the Pretoria puke bucket handy and that Alfred E. (who from now on will be referred to with whatever S,I or A word I can think of at that moment) is going to hell. Maybe 20 years from now, maybe he’ll get hit by an icecream truck getting a Mr. Softy, maybe his heart will explode at an all you can eat buffet. Whatever happens to Mr. Slimebag, he’s going to hell for what he did today.

I don’t want to get into a theological discussion about hell, maybe it exists, maybe it doesn’t, maybe it is in our own heads. Just mark my words when I tell you that the universe does not take kindly to what happened in court today. I do not as a general rule offend easily. I have an extraordinary ability to see everything from the other persons point of view as well as my own. It takes something major to offend me. My feelings get hurt, I get angry, I get maudlin, but I do not get offended. Until today. The remainder of the 4 idiots of the apocalypse can save him a seat if they get there first. And no, before this little bit of writing gets taken out of context I’m not threatening anyone. Wishful thinking, oh you bet, but I’m not making any threats.

So ChaCha forgot that silent is an option on her phone in court today and this happened. At least we all know what her ringtone is now…omglolroflmao.

Bishop Vernon Parker was called to the stand. Sexual deviant attorney was up because there was sex stuff to be discussed. He started out asking Bishop Parker about his responsibilities and if his position is prominent and he is looked up to. Bishop Parker, who is in his late 60’s early 70’s according to two separate sources (those things you are supposed to have when you make statements of fact) seemed uncomfortable on the stand. Alfred E. Asshat asked about what the role of a Bishop was and he dripped sarcasm doing so. And I was offended for the first time today. Alfred. E Isadick continued to hammer at the Bishop about the fact that people look up to him. The Bishop answered very politely that his role was to help guide people and not to receive admiration. Alfred E. Analwart was being aggressive to the point where the jury noticed when he asked about temple worthiness and what kind of disciplines are handed down. He then asked the Bishop, THE BISHOP, if he was an honest man. I heard a hundred people collectively gasp in their heads. The Bishop still with his quiet dignity answered yes. Alfred. E sickerthanshit jumped all over that answer with why the Bishop felt a need to bring an attorney with him. That of course was answered on Wednesday if you recall. It was because certain questions regarding parish people cannot be answered and the lawyer was there on the off chance that the Bishop wasn’t sure. He is trying to discredit the Bishop simply because he has an attorney there, and by the looks of things it is going over like a lead balloon. The Jury is completely stone faced. Alfred E. Ick asked if a sinner can baptize someone. The Bishop answered yes if they lied their way through. There is very little note taking during the blatant fuckery going on at this particular moment in time. Asshole asked if someone without a temple recommend could perform a baptism. The Bishop said yes in a church just not in a temple as long as the Bishop approves following a brief interview.

Alfred E. Shithead asked the Bishop if he recalled Travis lived with him for 6-9 months. The Bishop calmly says he remembers saying that but that he corrected his statement if Alfred E remembers that. Alfred. E almost yelled “Did Mr. Martinez tell you to say that?” That would be the moment Juan busted his muzzle, snapped the chain holding him to the prosecution table, ate the dart the vet deployed and roared OBJECTION!! Alfred E. Idiot jumped backwards and straight up about 6 feet and decided that now would be a good time to change the line of questioning. And maybe his depends. Moving on to the computer he said was it located in the living room. The raging pitbull sat down and one of the bailiffs tried distracting him with his favorite nurmi chew toy. The Bishop confirmed it was in the living room and anyone could use it. Alfred E. Asshat says the Bishop can’t keep his stories straight about who slept there to which the pitbull once again reared his mighty head and roared objection. Not a Judge Stephens sustained it in record time.

And that would be when the Macarena busted out in court. And Cha Cha took the call. IN COURT.

Alfred E. Scumbag is being a complete and total dick to the Bishop and this may not be the witness to act like that with. Just sayin’. Bishop Parker said that everyone suspected that it was Jake that was responsible for the pop-ups on the computer. Alfred E is actually yelling, YELLING at Bishop Parker to be honest. Juan is fighting hard to protect the Bishop and as it turns out despite a bit of confusions as to dates the Bishop remained completely adamant that Travis never used his computer. You have to remember that this is an old man, this all happened 14 years ago, and he had no idea that something as innocent as computer usage should be committed to memory. Wonder if Alfred E. can remember what he ate at sizzler 14 years ago. The Jury still looks very disapproving. Then Alfred E. brought out the stuff for which I hope that he burns in hell for. Alfred. E spent a great deal of time asking things and then when the Bishop started to answer he would bark I have no question pending. That would be out of the Juan Martinez handbook. They do say that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery right?

All aboard the sex train because that is what some low level mediocre sex crimes specialist does. Conductor shithead put on his conductor hat and proceeded to try and give the Bishop a heart attack. He proceeded to ram home (sorry) every act of sexual deviance that was ever performed by Stabby and Travis. He went into lurid and uncalled for detail. He talked about anal, oral, and vaginal penetration. Facials, ass poundings, the sex tape, and when he was done and he Bishop was the color of slightly off cottage cheese he sweetly asked if those would be considered a no no in the Mormon Church. The Bishop answered. How about anal ignorant fuck continued. Is that less of a transgression? the Bishop answered that a sexual transgression is a sexual transgression, which of course Alfred E. already knew. If someone is having sex, does that make them less desirable as a partner. The Bishop answers that he can’t answer that. The Bishop by now is very obviously uncomfortable.

Is Deanna Reid married with Children was the next question, which of course was to allude that because she had sex she was not suitable marriage material. The Bishop answered that she was not.

Asshole E. then went back to Travis and Stabby having sex and the type of sex they were having. He wants to know what the Bishop would have done. The Bishop said that they would have had to discuss it and he would decide what to do. He is trying to get the Bishop to say that Travis should have been disciplined more harshly because he had more transgressions. the Bishop said probation could have happened which means he couldn’t give message or receive sacrament or could be ex communicated.

With that Juan was up. And by up I mean he was completely beside himself angry.

Juan brings of the defense deposition of the Bishop and we have an objection and immediate sidebar. The objectomatic made a very strange almost screechy noise when it deployed. Apparently somebody doesn’t want the depo entered into evidence. The defense was over ruled and Juan continued. He began his trademark pace. was the prosecution present at this deposition. The Bishop said no. Who was present at the deposition? Stabby, Jenny, Alfred E. the Bishop and his attorney. Stabby is looking sicker and sicker by the moment. A migraine may be coming on any second now.

Nurmi doesn’t want the exhibit admitted to which not a Judge Stephens said tough tittie and it went into evidence. Juan, who was not at the deposition reads the transcript. It says the Bishop was asked if his story changed. Juan, still pacing said you were asked over and over if having your lawyer present caused you to change your story at the deposition. Juan smacks it up on the overhead and isadick objects like Juan just smashed a frosted chocolate cake. After the sidebar which Juan won we went back to the overhead. Question: has anyone within your church advised you to hold back information. answer NO. Juan moved quickly to another exhibit and of course there is another objection and sidebar. (is there free food up there or something?) Again Alfred E. Analwart is overruled and deposition two is smacked up onto the overhead like Juan would like to beat it to death. Question – Does the name Marc McFuckstick’s brides name ring a bell. Answer by Bishop Parker – yes. Who is she. answer: She moved in after Travis moved out.

Juan moved away from the overhead and paced back and forth. He addressed the Bishop. Was Stabby as guilty of serial transgressions as Travis was? Do the same rules apply? Yes. The affidavit from Marc McFuckface said that he arranged for his soon to be wife to live with the Bishop. The bishop said no, the girls father made those arrangements NOT Marc.

Juan next took the interview between the defense and the Bishop and shook it in his steel trap jaws until it was in fifty million pieces, ascertaining that the Bishop was not being dishonest, the defense failed to ask specific questions. Good old Alfred E is objecting to everything and being shot down in flames.

Juan moved to admit and email between Travis and Deanna and the objectomatic finally gave it up. Overuse will kill a spring loaded seat really fast apparently. And we have sidebar 15 or so for the day. Once again the objection appeared to be overruled since Juan didn’t change gear as is his way when an objection doesn’t go his way. There was a question asked on the deposition about Travis emailing Deanna from the Bishops home computer. The Bishop stated that Travis went to friends houses to email Deanna. No wonder the defense didn’t want that in the record. Kind of undermines the whole Travis used the computer thing.

A recess was called and all the main players trooped into chambers. Eventually they came back, nobody knows why they were there. Anybody want to play 20 guesses. I was hoping the finally just gave it up, but apparently not.

Juan who had actually eaten one of the vets darts was definitely not feeling the effects as he tore into some email between the Bishop and Marc McFullofshit- Nurmi is objecting to this because of time zones. YUP you read that correctly. Don’t even ask me, I just report this shit.

The Bishop said that Marc was good with computers. He also emphatically stated that Marc Mcliarliarpantsonfire were not friends, did not hang out and wasn’t sure that they even knew each other. Turns out the Bishop never ever, ever saw Deanna with Marc and that Travis and Linda never hid their relationship from anybody. They were extremely open about it. At that point Stabby looked like she would be very happy if the earth would open up and just take her home to Satan now.

There were some Jury Questions;

Is the person committing a sexual transgression worthy of being baptized into the church.

Is there disciplinary action taken against anyone that is perceived to have put into question the integrity of the church

Were any records of people kept in your home? NO

did the church track who lived there? NO

Do people living in home sign an agreement? NO

Would other people in the church be assigned a lawyer to protect the integrity of the church? depends on the position.

And with that Court adjourned until 10 am tomorrow.

Have a great night everyone
RBMD peacing the fuck out.

Advertisements

60 Responses to The Stabby Arias Penalty Phase Retrial- Ohhhh Somebody Is Going To Hell Edition

  1. karen30036 says:

    Brilliant! Funny! Thank you, Kelly!

  2. Lori g says:

    Great job Kelly. This just made me sick and I’m not religious. I don’t have a good feeling about today. How low can one go. I have decided that nurmi can’t get it up even with all this sex shit. Jenny thinks she’s all pretty and that, but news flash someone would have to put a bag over that dreadful face to do her. Chacha is getting instructions from hodi on being the best that she can be ,anally, orally and vaginally.
    Sorry for the rant. Not a judge should never have let that happen. Where the fuck is she, certainly not there. I am beyond disgusted. I just hope the jury didn’t buy this shit

  3. Jen Kane says:

    I can NOT fathom on any level how this is happening. Never ever ever even after being in law enforcement for 30 years and currently a domestic abuse counsellor have I witnessed such a spectacle in a court of law. Kelly.. thank you for putting words to my utter incredulous frustration and rage

  4. neevebrody says:

    Yep, I believe Beelzebub and his minions are at this very moment constructing an extra toasty, separate circle of hell for the ‘4 idiots of the apocalypse.’ And while we can’t ever know what’s in a juror’s mind, I believe we got some insight from their questions today. They are as over this shit as we are, and now with the Omnibus hearing delayed until April, god only knows if this farceofatrial will ever be over.

    Great blog as usual, Kelly. Thanks!

  5. Thanks, Kelly! Another great blog full of Nurmi aliases. Lol! These poor jurors! They are probably totally dying to ask each other, or someone else, wtf is going on, since there hasn’t been any testimony about Jodi in her entire mitigation phase, which has lasted for MONTHS! I’m sure they are totally and utterly confused, disgusted, and go home every night not believing or understanding what they’re hearing. I can’t wait for them to be interviewed when this is all over.

  6. debilu2 says:

    Another great one! Alfred E. is the lowest scum in the history of ever! Some of the jury questions made me wonder, but in the final analysis they have to be offended by Mr. S, I, or A (take your pick) attacking and trying to humiliate a Mormon Bishop! And now instead of Chacha we’ll have to call the notamitigationspecialist Macarena!

  7. Great read, Kell!!
    Yea..I called BACKFIRE last week. I knew Numbshit couldn’t hold his ignorance at bay.
    Dude…you play nice with a Bishop who’s on the stand (and not on trial …….. ).
    Bishop to King 7..Checkmate.

    • reallybigmeandog says:

      Heidi: I’m sorry I’ve been remiss in answering comments. I have some things that are taking up a lot of my time at the moment, but I think they are sorted now. Thank you for the kind words. How he did that to a man of god, I don’t care what particular god, you just don’t do that.

  8. Connie Rust says:

    Another job well done Kelly! i too can usually listen to idiots all day long without taking offense….I just do a lot of eye rolling. Today was not one of those days. I was raised Catholic; and while I do not practice any particular religion now I learned one thing at a very young age….respect for the Clergy…of any faith. What took place in that courtroom today was nothing less than repulsive. What respect I had for not a judge Sherry went sailing right out the window…..not that I had much to begin with. I realize judges are given a lot of latitude in how they run their courtrooms but I draw the line at far less than what went on today. She is a disgrace for allowing it. I believe she secured her position in hell right next to the 4 idiots of the apocalypse.
    On another note…I heard a disturbing rumor today. I honestly can’t remember where I read or heard it so am hoping you can confirm or deny it. I heard Alfred E is ramping up for the mother of all sur-rebuttals and plans on calling a gzillion witnesses to rebut the rebuttal and that it could go on for an infinite period….AND not a judge Sherry is allowing it (well of course she is). Did anyone else hear that? I think not a judge Sherry needs a Plexiotomy. For those who don’t know what that is….its a surgical procedure where a piece of plexiglass is inserted into the lower abdomen…thereby allowing one to see when one’s head is up their ass.

    • reallybigmeandog says:

      Connie. First, thank you. I agree with you whole heartedly, there are things you just do not do. Second, let me do some digging, it is afterall what I do. If I find out I will hit you back as soon as I know.

    • Connie Rust says:

      Kelly….just remembered where I heard that. It was Jen from Trial Diaries. I saw it on her Trial Talk Express evening show tonight.

    • renaes24 says:

      Connie, if JSS allows such a super-sur-rebuttal, I can only hope the jury catches on and starts throwing things at her. I hope at least one juror grabs Cha-Cha by the throat and shows her ‘anal’ with one of her Lucite stiletto heels…….and shoves 4 MONTHS of dirty socks down Alfred E’s miserable throat!
      Yup! Groundhog Day……..6 more weeks of utter nonsense that is the ‘mitigation’ portion of the trial.

      • Connie Rust says:

        Lol! I did see someone tweet that JSS confirmed there would in fact be a surrebuttal complete with the good doctor, Franchesca, Abe and Deanna (and many more I’m sure). That poor jury.

      • renaes24 says:

        Oh Bloody Hell! I feel sorry for US! We need to take up a collection for booze to get thru those 2 AGAIN. If I have to hear of the “cycle of violence’ one more time……Pass the BONG

    • reallybigmeandog says:

      Hai Connie. Sorry for my late reply. I’ve been busy with someone I can’t talk about right now, but you are smart you will figure it out. Alfred E is indeed ramping up the sur rebuttal train. I can for sure confirm two and at least two more although I can’t say their names until I get confirmation. I refuse to decimate rumor. But yes count on a sur rebuttal to beat hell. I agree about Judge Sherry.

  9. Samantha says:

    Hahaha as usual, the title alone has me laughing already 😀 you are so so so funny lady. going to read now! Yay!

  10. Hi Kelly!
    I am stunned that with all this ‘man of the cloth’ bashing, still not one mitigating factor has been presented. I am also stunned at the extent of ‘clergy bashing’, even to the point of yelling at the Bishop. Numbnuts just reminded me of some little fat boy bully on the playground.

    Great read, again, Kelly.

  11. Schaeffer says:

    Kelly, as you have undoubtedly determined, I greatly appreciate the fine art of being a smart ass, as well as the pleasure of a well turned phrase; however, I do have several observations/serious questions regarding legal procedures, the LDS church, etc. Can you or someone else here answer these types of question? If this section of your site is not the proper forum for this type of discussion, would you be willing to establish a section more suitable for such? grazie and ciao

    • reallybigmeandog says:

      schaeffer: there is a defacto legal section rbmd school of law posts but nothing re the LDS church. I would however be willing to create such if you can forward me the questions.

      • Schaeffer says:

        Sample legal questions

        1. Can MLDR be held in contempt of court for sending out twitter pics, having her phone ring. etc? Sanctioned? Made to pay a fine? Spend a night in jail? Isn’t she considered an officer of the court?

        2. Can a judge not set limits on court room decorum, like when Nurmi is slouching around at the defense table, and most especially, put an end to all of this nonsense sex talk since it has absolutely no bearing on mitigation? Frankly, I am not looking forward to 50 shades of gray, the movie, and I am most definitely more than over the 5,000 shades of bullshit that is Nurmi, Willmott, Maria, and WOBO .

        3. If a PC is taken in to a repair shop to have viruses removed, and child porn is discovered, are there laws which require reporting of same? Eons ago when people still had filmed developed into photos, homemade porn was okay to be developed unless it was child porn, and then the authorities had to be notified.

        4. Would some of the Judge’s rulings be more palatable, if not more understandable, if she would explain the rationale behind some of her rulings as she made them? The judge in the Martin MacNeill trial did this, and it was very enlightening and helpful to the general public.

        What do you think?

      • Shannamac says:

        Schaefer. Well said, 5000 shades of bullshit. That ought to be the name for this whole ordeal.

    • reallybigmeandog says:

      Schaeffer: a few of these I can answer right now so I will, the other couple I have to Skype a source in the morning. MDLR is NOT an officer of the court. She is under contract with the city. So is not under the same laws as officers of the court. She can still be held in contempt but that will never happen because it wouldn’t be an appealable issue.

      2. Of course the judge can set limits, she seems to choose not too. I liken this to Kangaroo court.

      3. Yes if child porn were discovered there is a law although the name escapes me but I will look it up that makes if a criminal offense not to report it. 4. I want to check into that although I tend to agree.

      • Schaeffer says:

        Now that you’ve seen a sampling of what I have in mind, should I send you other questions/observations here or e-mail, or in the de facto section? Or fuck off? If anyone else wants to weigh in, I would be glad for their input. I don’t want to put the burden on you entirely, especially with your health issues. I have seen a few posters who seem to have if not a formal legal education, a mind well suited to logical thinking.

      • Mama Via says:

        Haha! Having a legal education and a logical mind aren’t necessarily the same thing…proof: Numbnutz and Willsnot…I’m just sayin…

  12. achmelvichcastle says:

    Kelly, am rereading, it’s just so good. Love your descriptions.

  13. beverly wilkins says:

    Legal question: Why was the murderess allowed to be presen t at the deposition of the Bishop?

  14. Blef says:

    Today was disgraceful. What Nurmi was doing wasn’t mitigation, it was humiliation of an old man. I hope the jury was as appalled at this as every decent person who heard it was.

    The defense is being ripped to pieces and we haven’t even had the amazing Dr DeMarte yet. I can’t wait for her to give evidence again.

  15. essem58 says:

    Analwart and Macarena did it for me .. Father Cannell, what is JSS thinking? Was watching Judge John Deed last night (British legal series) and he was reprimanding the barrister for asking inappropriate questions. What a filthy pig Nurmi is to be asking the Bishop about anal sex. hope the jurors are equally disgusted as I was.

    • TrulyUSA says:

      Essem, I’ve decided the only thing more disgusting that Stabby is her defense team. They really are a match made in hell.

  16. renaes24 says:

    I cannot recall when I have ever seen a more tone-deaf attorney than Nurmi. Can he not fathom that his questions are turning the jury off? Does he truly believe his rhetoric is so stimulating as to keep jurors awake as long as he keeps tossing “anal” and “oral” into the mix? Perhaps he thought if he tossed the ‘sex crap’ around enough, the jury would be immune to it’s shock effect. If that were so, his questioning of the Bishop in such a manner brought back ALL the shock that we (and the jury) thought we were numb to.
    As for JSS? She deserves a place in hell! She deserves to be removed . She deserves many things. But she does NOT deserve any further RESPECT. For a long time, many have noted that she had lost control of HER courtroom. Now, with what occurred with the Bishop, she has lost her damn MIND!
    Has ANYONE seen one bit of mitigation? for a murder? Perhaps I missed something………
    I think JA could have done far better had she just did her little ‘dog & pony’ show : “I can grow hair”, “I can recycle”, “I can trace pretty pictures”. Nonsense is nonsense and were I on the jury, I would find myself pretty pissed that my times was wasted with these fools with NO MITIGATION. It’s not nice (or wise) to PISS OFF YOUR JURY!
    I can only wish that in the next batch of jury questions, that at least ONE of them asks “Can you ask Nurmi to SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP”.

  17. TrulyUSA says:

    Thanks so much, Kelly! I absolutely spit coffee at “Analwart” and “Isadick” too bad Nurmi’s first name isn’t Harry — what fun we could have with that! Hahahahah! Cha Cha’s ring tone is the Macarena? Now I will forever see her standing there in court crossing her arms and patting her ass in time like an idiot — why is it so easy to see her doing that? I thought that was stupid when the Clintons did it decades ago! To be serious for a moment, I can’t believe the depths the defense will stoop to make some point that means nothing to anyone. Attack a Bishop? I don’t care what religion you subscribe to, that is just wrong! Would he do the same to the Pope? Who would have thought that Nurmi, Wilnot, Cha Cha and Stabby could actually fashion a little halo out of sexual promiscuity and demand the Bishop declare it holy, and fashion a set of horns out of the very same stuff for Travis and demand the Bishop call it unholy. That’s about all I could get out of today’s testimony, Stabby good, Travis bad, because Nurmi said so. I bet Stabby whispered to Cha Cha — “turn your damn phone down, I said we can’t practice unless we’re in holding!”

    • Ruthanne says:

      Look at who his typical clients are, the business he started of his own. Who chooses to deal in that stuff and defend those people? He is disgusting, and well suited to “defend” someone like that evil thing.

      I know not everyone prays, but I prayed extra hard after the treatment of the bishop yesterday, and I believe it was answered because today I heard angels sing while DeMarte spread truth and light all over the courtroom and everyone in it.

      And the demons moaned in agony. 🙂

      • Ruthanne says:

        Ok I was replying to MamaVia and the Nurmi’s balls comment, not sure why my reply ended up here, but if you are confused that is why. LOL

    • reallybigmeandog says:

      Truly: YAY POINTS!! I know right about the Macarena. I almost peed my pants.

  18. uniden0014 says:

    Just when I thought it could not get any uglier in the court room…it did!! Some day, some how, some way, the DT will answer to the ugly. God does not like UGLY!!

  19. Mama Via says:

    For the first time in like…….EVER…I am fukkin speechless….

    I’m prone to think that Numbnutz is being directed by Satan’s minion, Stabbi McStab….BUT he didn’t tell her NO, so, I’m betting he is feeling the Heat of Hell in his Scruple-less Balls!

  20. Sherlock1005 says:

    Good Morning Everyone,

    Another great blog Kelly ! Thank you ! lol @ Alfred E. Asshat !

    However, what is not funny (as has been expressed by all that post here) is what a monumental, disgusting pig Nurmi is !! This DT has no boundaries, no morals and are a complete disgrace. If I was a juror and needed one more thing to get me to the DP – yesterday’s freak show by the bottom feeder called Nurmi would definitely have been the icing on the cake. There is no mitigation in this – anyone can see that ! Not a judge should be ashamed of herself for letting this kind of behavior take place in what is supposed to be a court of law !!

    Kelly, do you know… If this debacle should ever end, will there be any sort of review, by not a judge’s superiors, about what has been allowed to take place in that courtroom ?

    I have followed numerous trials over the years, and I have never, ever seen anything like this in my life !! Makes me SO angry I could spit nails !!

    • TrulyUSA says:

      That’s a great question Sherlock! I would really like to see Not A Judge critiqued by her superiors and see what they have to say about all of this. Why has this not been done already? It makes no sense to me, either. If I did this badly in my job, I would have been fired long ago! Does anyone oversee the courtroom other than Not A Judge?

  21. hbbeachbun says:

    Great blog and hysterical. Asshat, Isadick and McFuckstick….LMAO. I agree with you TrulyUSA, I also would love to hear what Not A Judge’s superiors have to say.

  22. carmen geditt says:

    My favorite image was Juan shredding the interview by shaking it in his steel trap jaws, as if it were a bunny slipper, until it was in fifty million pieces.

  23. Mama Via says:

    Numbnutz better hope no one on that jury is a Mormon!

    Mormonism isn’t “my thing”….nor are 99% of what pass for “Christian”….but that doesn’t mean that I don’t respect those that do practice those faiths; nor do I disrespect their clergy! IF Numbnutz HAS a mother and grandmother, I’m SURE neither of them are out bragging that he is a lawyer! And they are probably wondering just WHERE they went wrong! I’d be so ashamed, that I wouldn’t be able to go to the grocer! (And I will bet, that as a child, he pushed little duckies into the water, too!) “I’m bringing home my baby bumble bee, won’t my mommie be so proud of me? I’m squishing up my baby bumble bee, won’t my mommy be so proud if me?” Yup, yup she will…just skip along, little Po, LaLa, Dipsy and Tinky Winkie!

    • reallybigmeandog says:

      Hai Mama: What Nurmi did today is going to send him straight to hell if you believe in that type of thing. How that man sleeps at night is something I cannot comprehend. He is quite simply a despicable human being.

  24. Connie Rust says:

    Well today was a much better day. Oh the sweet smell of revenge…….

  25. BlueWhiteRed says:

    Sorry, day late for me…this was great! I was so confused about S, I, A til….I got them. The phone? Macarena? PRICELESS. Thanks for laughs even though q’s disgusting. J4T!

    • reallybigmeandog says:

      Hai Blue: don’t be sorry, you read it and I appreciate it. Can you believe it, the fucking Macarena.

  26. Samantha says:

    hi lady! I see you toned down your vile language for those of us who are offended! Bhahhaaaha! Most excellent once again. What a day. Unbelievable with the king of slime and the Bishop.Truth is stranger than fiction, eh? Thank the stars that Juan is there, can you imagine if it had been anybody else? I remember in the interrogation room when Flores told jodi she had no idea what she was up against! Wow.This trial is insane. I can’t get enough, yet i cant wait til it’s over. I look forward to your thoughts and humor so much! Thankyouthankyou 😀

    • reallybigmeandog says:

      Hai Samantha: You made me put pop through my nose so POINTS!! I think I may award the one with the most points a prize at the end of the year. Thank you so much. Wait till you read tonights blog. You are going to feel all kinds of better.

  27. Ruthanne says:

    I loved it! And I haven’t heard tough tittle since high school! LOL
    Thanks for another great one. I loved the little digs and Juan eating the dart and chewing on the Nurmi chew toy, hilarious! My favorite part was the earth opening and JA going home to Satan, until I realized that didn’t actually happen. Oh well, maybe next time.

    • reallybigmeandog says:

      Hai Ruthanne: Thanks for reading it. I was a little sad about that too, but it could happen. Have a great night.

  28. Ruthanne says:

    I don’t know if everyone knows this stuff already, but someone did some research on it and passed on the info. Regarding the emailing between Travis and Deanna while she was on mission…the bishop was just a little confused because the questions were posed as though it COULD happen, bc DT wanted it to look that way, but emailing was NOT allowed back then when someone was on a mission. We already know how communication was handled and what was permitted from Deanna’s testimony, but to further clarify that, emailing became allowed as of 2013, AND ONLY once a month with immediate family, (in her case it would have been parents). Just in case anyone became confused or wondered why bishop and Deanna’s answers didn’t jive.

    • Connie Rust says:

      Juan pointed that out to the jury during his redirect. I hope they got it. Slime ball Nurmi was setting up the Bishop and I hope he rots in Hell for it. Assbag……

Behind The Words... With Kim

Examining the minds and actions of female killers

Varmt News Network

It's the Internet.

Just Da Truth!

musings of a dangerous mind

peskyvarmt

Just another WordPress.com site

Asleep in Left Field-My Life

4 out of 5 Friends recommend this WordPress.com site

Out in left field

(Totally fictional) Drama Queen Stories

CALLS FOR JUSTICE

sometimes, there are monsters walking amongst us

%d bloggers like this: