The Many Misdeeds of Juan Martinez

October 23, 2019

fifth circle of hell-Rockford

Hello my lovelies.  It is me, Queen of all I survey, dog lactation consultant, Horse, dog and pig whisperer, owner of indentured servitude of inhouse psychic, and all around saddened by the madness that this whole Juan Martinez mess has turned into.

So if I failed to mention it Juan has been placed on official probation for a year due to the small mountain of prosecutorial misconduct charges against him.  He is still allowed to practice law but must take an unknown amount of continuing education classes and if there is a god some classes on how to treat women in general.  the thing that really frosts my pop-tart is I was part of the problem.  I saw him as a white knight resplendent on his high horse fighting for the rights of those who could not speak for themselves; and he did that, he just didn’t do it fairly or justly.  That is not justice.  Maybe there is no justice.  I am shaken to my core by some of the allegations brought forth.

The ruling was handed down on September 28th from the Attorney Discipline Probable Cause Committee. They determined there is cause for claims Juan Martinez engaged in unprofessional conduct, and engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice.

This is punishment for a culmination of a bunch of cases not just Stabby although of course that is balled up in there too.  The order did not mention any particular cases but you know I’m digging them out, there are a total of eleven although I believe four have been dismissed.  I have to double check on that.  I know for sure three or four have been dismissed.   The committee has accused not so Juanderful of being slow to produce evidence that could help the defense(legally he has to do that), misrepresenting expert testimony, outing the identity of a juror during the arias proceedings and acting unprofessionally towards defense council although in his defense if they are talking about Nurmi I understand why.

Not so Juanderful anymore has a record of sexual harassment that goes back decades.  A bar complaint has also been filed against Bill Montgomery alleging he has been covering up Martinez’ harassment for just as long. They are calling for his resignation.

So, he started a sexual relationship with Jen Woods who he knew very well had the major hots for him so that he could get her to dig up some dirt on one of the jurors that was not voting for the death penalty in an attempt to get that juror disqualified.  When that did not work the slimy little fucker started a relationship ( nobody is saying if it was or was not of a sexual nature) with a juror who had been dismissed from the case in order to get a read on two other jurors may be leaning.  He was questioned about his actions at a deposition and he fucking lied.  The lead prosecutor in a death penalty case lied.

There are several reprimands in his personnel file pertaining to the harassment of female co-workers. anything pertaining to Martinez’ misconduct was sealed at Montgomery’s request.

All that Montgomery, who is now a State Supreme Court Justice would say when questioned was that Martinez was disciplined with  written reprimands.  Believe me when I tell you I am almost more interested in Bill Montgomery at this point and he should know that is never a good thing.

Juan’s new kingdom consists of the stolen car division where he can berate hubcaps and if he is lucky maybe he can question a rotting side panel or something.  Of course he can always talk about gas cans.

I think that Juan is probably going to be disbarred.  We can only hope that the process for that takes a while.   A long while.

I will be continuing to dig until I get the answers that I want.  My next spelunking mission is facebook.

That is it for now my lovelies

RBMD peacing the fuck out.

 

 

 

 

 

 


Things just keep getting sketchier and sketchier and Houston we may have a problem.

October 21, 2019

Third circle of hell – Rockford

Hello my lovelies. It is me, Queen of all I survey, Better judge than not a judge, dog, horse and pig whisperer and author of the big book of words and adding private detective to my repertoire.

Raise your hands if you know what double jeopardy is. Everyone? Well I am going to explain in succinctly anyway. If you are charged with something say murdering your boyfriend three different ways and you get off, you can never be charged with murdering your boyfriend 3 different ways ever again. Hell you could rent a billboard saying guess what I did and nada. Problem being if there is egregious enough prosecutorial misconduct then double jeopardy can and has in the past been applied depending on the State. I am searching the online Arizona law library right now so I will have an answer but right now the best I can do is double jeopardy will only attach IF the prosecutorial misconduct was perpetrated solely to prevent and acquittal. Since an acquittal was never an option double jeopardy should not attach. From what I have found so far. I will keep looking.

I’d like to start a tally of lives ruined over this fucking trial and the fact that Juan can’t keep it in his pants. His girlfriend who from everything I have gathered was a sweet woman who did not deserve this GONE.
Jen Woods Husband GONE
Jen Woods Credibility GONE
Juan Martinez’ Credibility GONE
Judge O’Neil who dismissed several violations credibility WAIVERING
Removed Jurors who gave Juan information Credibility GONE
Bill Montgomery Credibility GONE

That is just a start and there will be more of these as well. This my loyal friends is a complete and total clusterfuck.
Much like Truly, I wonder what Juan has on Bill Montgomery. Whatever it is I will find it and I’m betting it’s huge. Like pictures of bill fucking a pony huge. If it is out there to be found, I will fucking find it. I like turning over rocks and seeing what kind of icky little bugs crawl out from underneath.

I have serious doubts that Stabby will get a new trial. That being said, it is a thing that could happen and although so far I haven’t found anything to warrant a new trial, there may be a judge that errs on the side of caution of innocent until proven guilty it could happen. My bigger fear is that if it does happen they offer her a deal instead of putting a whole new trial on. And I pretty much guarantee if there is a new trial that cameras will be excluded. Since this was one of Stabby’s biggest complaints and since no matter what the jurors say it was almost entirely impossible to avoid the coverage I think we are going to be shit out of luck for cameras. The good part of that is the entire first trial is on video for all eternity and she can be called out on each and every little lie she tells. In my perfect world she gets a new trial, is found guilty AGAIN and gets the death penalty. You would be able to hear me laugh clear across Canada.

That’s it for tonight
Love to you all
RBMD peacing the fuck out


Time To Get Over The 800 Lb Gorilla in the Room.

October 19, 2019

Second circle of Hell – Rockford

Hello my lovelies.  It is I your wayward Queen, dog lactation consultant, pretend judge, pretty good fake lawyer, horse whisperer and over all pissed off human being.

Firstly, I owe you all an apology.  You see, I got stars in my eyes when I saw the passion and commitment of the person called Juan Martinez.  The way he objected made my heart beat faster, the way he walked all over his witnesses gave me cold sweats and because of that I did not follow my very own first rule of writing.  I did not vet Juan Martinez and for that I am truly sorry.  Turns out Juan is just another asshole who cannot keep his dick in his pants and not the god like creature we made him out to be.

Having said that, there are other guilty parties in this shit show that is the stabby arias trial and they are getting it today too.  I will be using the word allegedly a lot.  as in “allegedly”. Take it how you want.  I have no fucks left to give so names will be being used and I’m calling the whole shit show out on the carpet and I’m rubbing someone’s nose in it.

Juan has fallen far and hard and I hope he landed in a steaming pile of shit when he did so.  He has been bumped down from lead prosecutor on death penalty cases to auto theft so there is that.  Try walking around the office with that hanging over your head.  He will finish out any trials he has going on right now (not including stabby) and then he gets to find lost cars.  This is “allegedly” to give him time to concentrate on his upcoming disciplinary shit.

Now there is prosecutorial misconduct and then there is PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT.  We are dealing with both so I will do the small ones first.  And when I say small all I mean by that is they probably won’t get him disbarred.  Juan has had a minimum of seven complaints that I can find in a four year period.  That ladies and gents is a ridiculous amount.  He has “allegedly” made very inappropriate sexual comments in the office to a couple of different women who of course filed complaints. He was so blatant that women would hide in the bathroom just to get away from him.   Bill Montgomery which is a name I think is going to come up a lot keeps trying to sweep all of Juans small indiscretions swept under a very large rug.  He is also under investigation now.  ABC15 says Juan’s track record of sexually harassing women goes back decades.  In 2016 it was recommended that good old pigdog Martinez be placed on a years probation for his blatant misconduct but that was halted in it’s tracks when Juan requested and was granted a disciplinary hearing on the spot and misconduct was dismissed.

Now to the PROSECTORIAL MISCONDUCT

Don Juan started an “Alleged” affair with Jen Wood who at one point was part of a very successful blogging duo who covered trials.  I cannot for the life of me remember the other girls name although I want to say Sherry so I’m going with that until someone corrects me.  Now I owe Sherry a huge apology because I flat out called her a liar when she told the world Jen was having an affair with Juan.  I did not want to believe it so I did not. Now Jen “allegedly” thought this was some crazy in love bullshit between them but all Juan was doing was figuratively and literally using the girl for information.  This was not some splendor in the grass bullshit it was Juan using Jen to get info on a juror who was voting against the death penalty.  He wanted dirt on said juror to get them removed from the case.  There were two more jurors he wanted dirt on but I am still working on what exactly happened there so I will update you tomorrow.

To say I am sick and saddened by this turn of events would be an understatement.

RBMD peacing the fuck out.

 


Wow. Juan is in some serious trouble

October 14, 2019

 

Juan Martinez’s disciplinary hearing has been postponed from August 27th for 30 to 60 days after a judge dismissed some of the ethics charges against him late last Friday afternoon. Famous for his role prosecuting high-profile murder cases, including the Jodi Arias case, Martinez was supposed to begin a disciplinary hearing over a slew of alleged ethics violations.  Apparently Juan had a habit of sexually harassing office staff but his lawyer argued that ethics rules do not regulate how one conducts oneself in the office.  So those charges are out. What this means is that the reprehensible things he did in the office are a non starter.  These things included — including telling an intern he “wanted to climb her like a statute” and sexually harassing female coworkers so relentlessly they hid in bathrooms to get away from him — will no longer be something those women will speak of  about before the disciplinary judge. But allegations that Martinez shared confidential information about a juror, struck up a sexual relationship with a blogger writing about the Arias case then lied about it to investigators, and sexually harassed a court reporter will still be heard at the hearing

O’Neil is expected to hold a status conference on Tuesday to figure out how the case will proceed, Channel 12 News reports. If the judge determines Martinez has committed the alleged ethics violations, he could be sanctioned or disbarred.

And we now know how Jen Wood had the inside on the case, she was fucking the guy. The court reporter who said Martinez told her he wanted to see what was inside her skirt is still expected to ready to testify, as is Jen Wood, the blogger Martinez is accused of having an affair with and leaking information to.  Shame on you Jen.  You turned on your friend, you ruined a relationship and what did it get ya?

Martinez has been the subject of at least seven bar complaints in the past four years. This past March, the State Bar of Arizona filed a misconduct complaint against Martinez alleging that he had committed seriously unethical behavior during the Arias trial and inside the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office. This disciplinary hearing stems from that complaint.

According to the complaint, Martinez began a sexual relationship with a blogger who was writing about the Arias case, then used her to dig up information on a juror who was preventing Arias from receiving the death penalty. Martinez wanted to find “information that might disqualify her from continuing the deliberation.” Once he figured out who the holdout juror was, he allegedly tried to get her dismissed from the case so he could get Arias sentenced to death, but failed.

Martinez is also accused of striking up a relationship with a juror who was dismissed from the case and using her to get a “read” on how two other jurors may be leaning in the case. When questioned about his actions at a deposition, Martinez lied, the bar complaint states.

In April, four lawmakers and 18 local, state, and national organizations signed on to a letter sent to Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery demanding he resign for the way he has handled Martinez’s repeated misconduct. ABC15 has since reported that Martinez’s history of sexually harassing female coworkers goes back decades.

Martinez’s personnel file contains a reprimand from a supervisor in the early 1990s. The supervisor wrote: “It has come to my attention that there was an incident in February, where you made inappropriate sexual remarks toward a female attorney in this office. … It is now time that this behavior ceases, once and for all.”

In 2016, the Attorney Discipline Probable Cause Committee recommended that Martinez be placed on one year’s probation for his unethical behavior. But Martinez asked for a disciplinary hearing, in which deliberations reportedly lasted all of one minute before the charges were dismissed.

Excerpts from newstime phoenix

RBMD and really disappointed mean dog peacing the fuck out.

 


Stabby Is a Saint…So Says Stabby.

December 1, 2014

 

OMGLOLROFLMAO-Arizona

Hai everybody. Hope you are all well. I would like to take this opportunity to let you know that I have been declared Queen by PV. PV declares me queen. SEE!!!!

I don’t know where Mean is, but I am Queen of that region now. All Hail HRM Queen Kelly. YAY!!

As you all know, today was a down day in Maricopa County Court because why not! I figured I was going to be writing a blog about something else. Stabby being the altruistic um…thing  that she is, and obviously aware of my sadness over not being able to continue to point out exactly how full of shit she is, had this written just so that I could indeed continue to point out how full of shit she is.

Stabby is a saint!!

Here is what appeared on some site that is run for Stabby. Unfortunately, whoever was taking shorthand didn’t do a very good job, I decided to fix it for her. Consider it MY charitable act of the day. My corrections will appear in bold italics.

Here’s an interesting (I dunno, just put in some Einstein-y sounding word here) dichotomy: Sheriff Joe, who is a purported proponent of charity, prohibits acts of charity among the inmates in his charge.(That is actually a bald faced lie, Sheriff Joe does not allow the passing of commissary because it is usually used in payment for something like drugs or crayons, or things to hide in my wonder holes.) It’s a rule—one I recently broke. I gave food to someone(so I could grab some more press making myself look wholesome and good, bwahahahahaha I wonder which of the idiots will buy that) who was hungry. It wasn’t much(because why give away a bunch of good stuff when a little thing will do the same job,) just a snack. Of course, this doesn’t make me a saint(OMG LOL I don’t believe I am actually getting someone to write that) (not that there would be any confusion—many misguided(no they’re not, but don’t tell them) souls believe I’m the devil incarnate). Who wouldn’t spare a little food for someone who was hungry?(Well, normally I wouldn’t, but Hello.  Sympathy vote ) No brainer there.

Yet true to the adage “No good deed goes unpunished,” my random act of(using someone else to my advantage) kindness resulted in “restriction,” meaning no phone calls (except legal) and no canteen. The latter is where the crux of the irony lies. I chose( to break a rule that I was very aware was in place because rules don’t apply to me)  to give food to someone who was hungry, and for that I was punished(in the exact same way that every other prisoner is) by being made to go hungry(that is totally not true, we all know it is a human rights violation to withhold food, I just don’t like nutri-loaf. Put that in anyway, most of the idiots will believe whatever I say)—on Thanksgiving, no less. For(using another inmate to get myself some press) giving. Because my giving was in violation of a rule that at first blush seems absurd.

The rule was not created arbitrarily, however. Some inmates pass weapons or drugs. Others(and by others I mean me) use canteen as currency, offering it as payment for pills, tattoos, and other unmentionables. Almost invariably, a fight breaks out on canteen day over someone failing to pay their debt(which is yet another reason I am very happy that I pulled this off.)  You wouldn’t believe the drama that can escalate over a 75-cent bag of chips.  The rule was put in place to curtail, if only somewhat successfully, security risks such as these, not to keep hungry people hungry.  But rather than split hairs and run the risk of showing bias, (don’t tell them that a jail is not a democracy and rules are rules) it’s a blanket rule that applies equally to everyone in theory, not so much in practice. (Not really but that  makes it sound like I have been centered out for punishment without saying it).

Well, I can’t let someone(that I can use to my advantage) go hungry if I’m in a position to help. I just can’t. I don’t like feeling hungry, do you? (actually, I don’t like feeling horny and I need to eat to compensate.)  I love (taking it up the ass) food.  I’m munching on a green apple as I write this.  (Wait, maybe don’t put that because they will realize that my punishment was not in any way severe) Does this justify my breaking a rule? (Of course it doesn’t, but I’m Stabby Einstein so I can whine if I want too.) That would depend on whom you’re asking. Any officer with the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO), if going on the record, would tell you that breaking a rule, even one classified as “minor,” such as in this case, is never justified. Writer Martha Beck (who has nothing to do with this but the quote makes me sound all noble and shit) offers us a different perspective. In this quote, she very eloquently explains the state of my heart:

If everyone kept all the rules, we’d still be practicing cherished traditions like child marriage, slavery, and public hangings. The way humans become humane is by assessing from the heart, rather than the rule book, where the justice of a situation lies. Sometimes, (like whenever I can use it to my advantage) you have to break the rules around you in order to keep the rules within you—my emphasis.

I’m not (OMG YES I AM.  Hope everyone forgets that I was growing pot, and hurt a dog, and killed a guy in cold blood) a ruler-breaker by nature, but I sometimes go against the grain, even when it chafes. As the reality settled in that my giving in this instance would not lead to receiving (like it did when I’d say give a blowie or some good anal), as karmic law says it should, but would lead to a loss(like that time when I missed out on cinnabon,) the seeming poetic justice gave me pause. It was like anti-karma.

The Hearing Sergeant(who I would totally let finger bang me in exchange for a sharpie) came to see me about the incident two days later, just as SRT (Special Response Team) was picking me up for court. Half-jokingly, one of the officers asked me, (are you ever going to figure out that YOU don’t make the rules) “What have you learned from this situation?” I’m sure this wasn’t the answer they were expecting, (and it is totally not what I said, but it makes me sound good doesn’t it?) but the lesson was clear: “No charitable acts at Estrella.”

– Stabby Einstein.

I hope she appreciates the effort I put in to fixing a very obviously erroneous post. She should fire whoever is running that site.

In other news, Alfred E has filed motioned number eleventy billion to have the death penalty removed since her mitigation witnesses don’t want to testify in open court. Isn’t that…odd. Three people, and not one of them is willing to testify in open court. Wonder if they might be worried that someone who knows they are lying may come forward to say they are lying. Court Chatter got the scoop on one, Marc McGee. Here is the link to Court Chatter http://www.courtchatter.com/2014/12/jodi-arias-another-mystery-witness.html?spref=tw
I have seen posts by someone going by the name of Marc McGee who has been posting for over a year on Facebook. In one he said to paraphrase that Stabby already killed a guy and did Juan want to be the guy trying to kill her? He is very obviously in love with being the center of attention. Other witnesses are allegedly Matt McCartney and a former co-worker.

That is it for right now. Really Big Mean Dog peacing the fuck out.

PayPal Donate Button

Spare some change for a poor sad street urchin?


The Stabby Arias Penalty Phase Retrial-The Suffering In Silence Edition

November 25, 2014

I know I have said it before but; AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!-Arizona

Hai everybody. Been a minute hasn’t it? I have emailed Jim Blackburn about 6 times now and he keeps promising me as soon as he can get to it he will and I don’t want to keep bugging him so I guess we will wait on the Jeffrey(the hippies did it)McDonald story.

Sorry about last night, windstorm was crazy and I had no power for just about ever. I did get the generator out long enough to leave a post here but I don’t know if everybody saw it. So, yeah no power, no blog. The only downside to living in the middle of buttfuck nowhere is you are hooped when stuff like that happens. Oh and just as an aside, generators are heavy as fuck.

I have a question for all y’all in the states? WTF are they putting in your water and shit? Holy. I did not have the internet last night because we had a huge wind storm and it knocked the power out. I get up this morning and Ferguson is on fire. Jesus Christ people. You know what? I get that people are angry, and frustrated, and probably filled with rage. What I don’t get; trashing stores that are owned by members of the community, lighting cop cars on fire that y’all get to pay for out of your tax money, and fighting against people that have BULLETS and shit. I watched for about 2 minutes and turned it off. What does this accomplish exactly? It is not going to bring that boy back and it sure as shit isn’t going to make the police less likely to shoot the next one and that whether or not you like it is just a fact. And for all us white folks out there. I think it’s nice and all you are showing solidarity, I truly do. But damn, don’t pretend like you understand what is going through your African American friends/neighbors/spouses soul, because unless somebody owned a member of your family and once that was over you were treated like you were livestock you just don’t. No matter how much you sympathize, you cannot, will not, EVER, understand the rage. It is like being non-Jewish and saying you understand what the Holocaust survivors went through. It is a patently ridiculous statement.

So Stabby. We started the day waiting for sometimes Judge Stephens and watching Nurmi google Alfred E. Nurmi and his reaction to what popped up. Either that or surfing twitter to check on those damn Jurors who might be using social media.

Sometimes Judge Stephens eventually showed up, Great Nana Dr. Sexpert was back on the stand and Juan, well Juan was about as mad as he has ever been. Three darts, and a half a box of good boy treats later, he was almost calm enough to get up and start cross examining. Almost.

He leaped up with a snarl and went immediately for Dr. Sexperts Jugular area. He started by asking about sexual practices and Stabby shaving the gaping opening to hell. He wanted to know if the fact that she went bald as a cue-ball was important to her? Great Nana Dr. Sexpert, who you will totally see before this is over has no bias what so ever (OMGLOLROFLMAO) said yes. Juan was on fucking fire. He wanted to know if what she was saying was that Stabby baring the curtains had to do with Travis. Great Nana Dr. Sexpert definitely seemed to be insinuating that but when confronted with the question head on said she didn’t know how Stabby groomed herself (BRB gotta find the Pretoria puke bucket) prior to this. Juan was determined to run this “expert” to ground today. Why didn’t you ask if she did this before? Are u saying this practice is so unique to Stabby and Travis that this was worth considering? She said that that wasn’t what she was saying but it totally was. The pitbull asked her if she did consider this though and she had to answer yes. Holy shit getting a straight answer out of this chick is like getting a bong out of Jenny From the Cell Blocks hands. FUCK!! And with that we were welcomed to sidebar number one of the day. Nurms is NOT amused.

Back from the sidebar, Great Nana Dr. Sexpert threw on her tri-focals and started to read a document while bitching about having to read said document, say it with me now, CONTEMPERANEOUSLY. She felt pressure to read the entire document to which I say, um aren’t things like the oh, I don’t know, DETAILS of the document kind of important? The pit bull said he was just trying to refresh her memory which I though was genius because it intimated that Great Nana Dr. Sexpert may have a memory problem. Hint, she doesn’t she just never read the fucking file unless the paragraph started “Stabby Said.” She went over the document and Juan said it was Matt that wanted to break up with Stabby and moved to get away from her. Great Nana isn’t having anyone dissing her Stabby and says she understood it that Matt cheated and they broke up. Juan then wanted to know if it maybe wasn’t just a little aggressive of Stabby to drive to confront Bianca, the chick that Matt was banging by this time. Dr. Sexpert actually kept a straight face while she said “nope, nuh uh, this is how every normal person acts.” Juan then said Stabby wasn’t suffering in silence at that time, was she? Great Nana Dr. Sexpert says this was a different relationship than Travis, which doesn’t really answer the question. Just sayin. She says she suffered in silence only with Travis. The pitbull was still on full roar and dart number 4 was deployed. The sarcasm dripping from his fangs he said “So you’re saying this suffering in silence skipped over Bobby, skipped over Matt, skipped over Darryl & landed right on Travis? Dr. Sexpert says she wouldn’t use the term skip over. (If she gets Juan to define something, I’m out!) Juan gave the expert a refresher course on the trials and tribulations of Stabby and her live ex-boyfriends aaaaaaaand sidebar number 2. We came back and the pitbull asked if she was refreshed as to the break ups. She said it described them but she doesn’t recall. Juan gently tells Great Nana Dr. Sexpert that she testified to specifics and she said “I don’t recall.” Juan got that quizzical look that all great dogs get when they are trying to figure something out and gently reminded her that she said it involved the computer. She said “I don’t recall.” Juan suddenly knew what was happening. That damn fog had rolled back in. He tested his theory. Isn’t it true Darryl tried to break up with Stabby and she’d have none of that? She said “I don’t recall he’d have none of it.” I’m starting to wonder if Great Nana Dr. Sexpert has dementia setting in. Either that or she watched all six seasons of OZ as a refresher course on how to testify. (HBO show from the late 90’s-early 2000’s. Google it.) Dr. Sexpert also could not recall when Stabby and Travis started to date, or her moving to seaside.

Juan got bored and moved on to more suffering in silence. He wanted to know if Stabby was suffering in silence when she went through Travis’ phone. Dr. Sexpert said no, that the suffering in silence came after. (BARF!) Someone remind me to send Mi’lady a Christmas card for sending me the puke bucket. Juan said that even when Stabby suspected that he was seeing other women she stayed in the relationship because she wanted to go on trips. Dr. Sexpert says that she kept that information to herself for a while. He brought up the balloon festival trip and Nurms suddenly woke the fuck up and brought up sidebar number 3.

And we were back and then back to the sidebar for number 4. Back again and Juan brought up the fact that they only dated for several months. Juan says that within two weeks of the break-up she moved from California to Arizona and the totally not biased at all Dr. Sexpert said “well, it’s not like they lived in the same ward or community.” Jesus if MY eyes rolled any harder they would be bouncing jauntily across the fucking room. The pitbull asks if that is pretty assertive? Dr. Sexpert counters that they had an ongoing sexual relationship. Well that isn’t suffering in silence is it? the pitbull roared.

Juan asked about Stabby playing peek a boo while Travis was making out with a woman. The still TOTALLY objective Dr. Sexpert said “well, she needed her social security card to which I say, What?” Juan asked the good ole’ Dr. Sexpert if peeping in someones windows is suffering in silence? Anyone see a theme here? Juan asked, “she won’t leave him alone will she?” Dr. Sexpert at least conceded that maybe Stabby was a little intrusive.

There was a 15 minute break and next we got to talked about being closeted and nope it’s not what you think. Apparently, the relationship that no longer existed and was just banging because like I have said a billion times, if some chick is throwing it around the guy is going to grab it, was “closeted.” It was closeted because Travis didn’t take out a half page add in the local paper that he was butt banging Stabby. when it was brought up that Stabby wasn’t running around telling the whole world she was banging Travis that was apparently different somehow because why the fuck not.

Stabby was looking kind of forlorn after lunch, but not Juan. Juan was looking…like the tranquilizer was wearing off. You are required to be informed and objective when you review materials but in this case you haven’t been objective, RIGHT? Dr. Sexpert said she used data points to keep it objective.

Next up was a chat log between Stabby and Travis which Great Nana Dr. Sexpert called a five hour rant. It was 2hrs and 10sec and Juan was all over her like she was a porterhouse steak. “You wanted to make this seem like Travis was out of control didn’t you?” snarled the mighty pitbull. “You were wrong on the time weren’t you? You went ahead and made a wrong statement to the jury.” Juan was in full attack mode now and Flores calmly put the attack suit on just in case he had to pole catch the ranting pit. 5 hours sure seems more impactful doesn’t it? He roared. And you also said the chat log was 16 pages when it was only twelve. You are supposed to be accurate right? Great Nana Dr. Sexpert said yes but the chat was formatted where it could be 16 pages to which once again I say WHAT? It is 12 pages or it is 16. It cannot be both.

We moved on to Dan Freeman and his sister and the trip they all took together. Juan said Travis wasn’t hiding her from his friends right? They went on trips together and when they got in an argument and Travis said something Stabby came right back didn’t she? That is not suffering in silence RIGHT? Juan then pointed out that Great Nana Dr. Sexpert said she had made an assessment of Travis to which she said no, it was more of an observation. The pitbull of course refused to back the fuck up and said “you made an assessment, a diagnosis out of this. Just what you said you aren’t doing right?” Next we got to define Assessment and I was about to quit this bitch like I said, but Juan was done and I figured I might as well see how much Nurmi did damage control for a bit. During that time we got another run down of Dr. Sexperts CV, the fact that sex sells and we shouldn’t be distracted and that she felt the state was insinuating that she was unethical and they mischaracterized her testimony. HINT No he didn’t. He didn’t insinuate a damn thing. He made it crystal fucking clear that is what he thought.

We are now recessed until December 2 2014. #giftfrombabyjesus

There you have it my lovelies you are now up to date on the never ending trial. RBMD peacing the fuck out!!

PayPal Donate Button

Hai! If you enjoy my blog, please consider donating to ensure content.  All donations are greatly appreciated. 


The Stabby Arias Penalty Phase Re-trial – The “I Fought The Law And The Law Won” Edition

November 4, 2014

What Constitution?-Arizona

Hai everybody. So sorry about Saturday. I had an emergency with one of my dogs and I didn’t have time to write a blog. It remains half done and I remain trying to get the smell of skunk out of my house, my nose and my dogs fur. Someone recommended Oxy-clean and I am almost ready to go there. Since court is dark tomorrow I might finish it up and post it tomorrow. Either that or The Really Big Mean Dog School of Law is going to have an emergency class. I won’t know till I know.

Over the weekend Aunt Stabby had some very nasty things to say about the Alexanders. I will NOT post that horseshit here. In a nutshell, Stabby good, Travis bad, someone owes the Arias family an apology. From me to you Aunt Stabby. EAT A DICK!!

Today in Stabby land the jury was sent packing till 1:15 so that an emergency hearing on the motion to quash not a judge Stephens ruling could be heard at appellate court. The appellate court Judges were looking less than thrilled to even be hearing this nonsense, and on an emergency basis pfffffft. This has a snowballs chance in hell of surviving appellate court. Speaking of less than thrilled, Media Attorney Bodney looks absolutely disgusted that he has to go before an appellate court to get this crap overturned.

I have no idea why but this was stuck in my head as everyone made their way into appellate court so…….here.

I suppose it’s David Bodneys fault. He just seems so….determined that he has had enough of not a Judge Stephens and her horseshit. As soon as I got a look at him on TV it started playing on loop in my head. Juan, Bodney and the taxpayers of the not so great State of Arizona vs Stabby, Alfred E Nurmi and not a Judge Stephens.

David Bodney was up first and I was right. He was very focused and quite annoyed. You could hear it in his voice and see it in his demeanor. He gesticulated while he made his case. He took about 8 minutes on direct saying “dudes, dudette, this is pretty much fucked because we have this thing called a constitution which says you can’t do this, there is not case law anywhere saying you can do this, therefore not a judge Stephens can’t do this.”

Bodney is a smart man. He pulled Nurmi’s argument out from under him before Nurms ever spoke, which of course wouldn’t stop Nurmi from speaking. He figured out just like I did that Nurmi was planning on having all the witnesses testify under seal and he addressed it before Nurmi did and argued very, very effectively against it. He pretty much fucked Nurmi without the benefit of KY.

Juan got up, smirked, told the appellate Judges that he objected to a stay of proceedings because the Alexanders deserve closure and sat down. He figured Bodney had this. Juan was mellow, like three ludes deep mellow. Apparently the vet was at court today.

Well, well, welly, well, well. Looks like Mr Bodney and I were right. Nurmi is trying to leave wiggle room to have the entire defense testimony under seal. WOW!! Just when I think bitch cannot possibly think up anything else to try and stall the proceedings, she goes and outstabbys herself.

He’s bitching about tweeting, about reporters running out and reporting on it. He said he gets death threats to which I said “NO, DUH!” One of the Judges said the exact same thing when he said and I quote “Isn’t the threat of intimidation always existing then?” He then looked at Alfred E. like the bottom bitch he secretly is and rolled his eyes hard enough that I expected to see them leave his head and bounce jauntily across the courtroom.

Bodney was up again and proceeded to take down Nurmi so very well that the little pit-bull looked proud. He told the Judges that Nurmi is conflating (combining into a composite whole) not a Judge Stephens rulings and he is correct.

Quote of the day goes to Bodney for this. “if people cannot see what is going on, faith in the justice system is threatened.” Think about that statement. I am Canadian. We have a justice system that we are pretty proud of. Even we do not arbitrarily close court except in very exceptional circumstances. Paul and Karla Bernardo come to mind. Media was NOT banned as I have seen people post on other sites that post my blog, there was a publication ban on what was in the tapes to preserve the victims dignity because it was so fucking horrible. Even that was only until the trial was over. Media was in the courtroom AT ALL TIMES. I was in the courtroom. Christie Blatchford of the Toronto Sun and I had lunch twice. The gallery was not allowed to view the videotaped evidence because it showed the torture and rape of two children. Only the Jury and the Lawyers and Judge saw them. Audio was played in court and that was enough to send members of the gallery running from the courtroom. I counted 27. That is how bad, how horrifically bad this was. I wept against a perfect stranger who wept against me it was so bad. At no time during that trial, which is one of the worst cases in Canadian history was the court closed to reporters OR the public. The American Justice system is supposed to be better than ours. Americans say it all the time. I see it coming off the rails more and more every day. It pisses me off. America is supposed to have the most transparent Justice system in the world and a LOT of the rest of the world looks to America. Know who is looking at America right now and saying see, we were right? Russia. North Korea. Places where democracy is just some beautiful unattainable dream. What not a Judge Stephens has done is a travesty. I am pretty sure the appellate court feels exactly the same way judging by what I am hearing. So now we wait.

Everybody trekked back over to regular court. And we waited, and we waited and we waited. Then we got a ruling. The appellate division issued a stay of the order sealing the testimony of witnesses. Everyone now stand, face Arizona and salute the appellate court. Thanks. Interesting thing, a stay is not a decision. Basically what a stay says is that there is enough merit in the motion that the appellate judges have to look into it. It means that the proceedings will continue without seal until the appellate court renders a decision. They did this because it was either stay the proceedings, which is not fair to the Alexander family or stay the order which effectively shuts not a Judge Stephens and the defense down without having to take the time to render a decision. A decision on this might not even be issued by the time the trial is over, so this was very important.

Juan and Detective Flores laughed and laughed all the way out of the courthouse, Jenny hit the bong hard, Nurmi once again had that FML look planted squarely on face and not a Judge Stephens was absolutely flabbergasted that the appellate court thought she might have made an error. Stabby had that I will cut a bitch look back on her face since the appellate court basically told her to get stuffed.

Court was cancelled for tomorrow so that they could figure out how the fuck to move the trial forward.

So, we already know it was Stabby on the stand. I expect now she is going to pull a complete hissy fit and say she will refuse to allow herself to be cross examined. She can do that, they cannot force her to speak. What they will likely do in this event is strike all the testimony (which I hate), the STATE can request a mistrial which Juan probably won’t, or she can be held in contempt and the Jury can be told she has refused to comply with the court. I like that one, gives you a really good idea of what Stabby is. Unfortunately, here is yet another appealable issue.

here is a link to Mr Bodney and company seeking relief through the appellate court. Sorry I can’t embed it, it has been disabled. http://youtu.be/dqJ4KRVyphI

Because the entire Stabby family is determined to get that murder money, mom of Stabby AND dad of Stabby put this little bit of shit up on the internet today.  I honestly thought at least dad of Stabby was horrified at what his precious stabbykins had done.  I was mistaken.  I thought his avoidance of the trial had to do with his horror at what his daughter had done.  I was wrong.   I suggest something to vomit in while you watch.  The Pretoria puke bucket is being used at the moment.  Sorry.

I just CAN’T with these people. Aunt of Stabby wants an apology and Mom and Dad of Stabby would like your cash please because being related to Stabby is like humping on a money printing machine. This takes capitalism to a whole other level doesn’t it? Christ on a Cracker. Murder is becoming huge business in Arizona. Someone please drop some Ebola, or Anthrax or maybe just a small nuclear weapon on these people. I hate this entire fucking bloodline.

Everybody have a great night. RBMD peacing the fuck out.

PayPal Donate Button

If you enjoy my blog please consider a small donation to help ensure content.  All donations are greatly appreciated.


Varmt News Network

It's the Internet.

peskyvarmt

Just another WordPress.com site

Asleep in Left Field-My Life

4 out of 5 Friends recommend this WordPress.com site

Out in left field

(Totally fictional) Drama Queen Stories

CALLS FOR JUSTICE

sometimes, there are monsters walking amongst us

Varmt News Network

It's the Internet.

peskyvarmt

Just another WordPress.com site

Asleep in Left Field-My Life

4 out of 5 Friends recommend this WordPress.com site

Out in left field

(Totally fictional) Drama Queen Stories

CALLS FOR JUSTICE

sometimes, there are monsters walking amongst us