I know you are but what am I? -Arizona
Hai Kids. Hope tonights blog finds everyone well. I DEFINITELY hit a nerve with the last blog, because the mean comments came in fast a furiously. I refuse to post them (for now, I am saving them for a special edition along the lines of Mean Tweets with Jimmy Kimmel) but I won’t give them the satisfaction of seeing them on my blog right now. I guess they don’t know that I have moderation rights. If you don’t agree with something you can say so, just don’t say things like you want to fill me full of your body fluids or things like that. I am a rape survivor and things like that even if I wasn’t are just beneath anyone that wants to hang on to the title of human. Also, just because you brought my IQ into question, it was tested by my psychiatrist and it went off the scale. Just sayin’. I have an exceedingly thick skin and most of it I just find hilarious. Hilarious that I am getting so deeply under the skin of the Stabbyites. It fills me full of glee. I have also not been feeling my best for the last 5 days or so, so please bear with me if there are nights I do not blog. I am tired all of the time. I think I may be coming down with a cold or the flu and I feel quite unwell truth be told. I will do my very best, but until the surgery is over I have to consider my health.
We will get into the testimony of yesterday in a moment, but I wanted to bring something to everyone’s attention. Kirk Nurmi has been absolutely adamant that it is us, all of us on social medias well as journalists that are derailing this trial. He brings it up at minimum once a day. While there may be some validity to the way this trial has been sensationalized it does not in any way change the fact that Stabby killed a man by inflicting 27 stab wounds, slashed his throat deep enough to sever his trachea and shot him in the face. That and the fact that Stabby herself was the one that courted the media leaves me with nothing to say except shut the fuck up already Nurms, it’s getting old. That said, if he really believes that it is social media that is the problem, why is it that Cha Cha Delarosa, Mitigation specialist/dance instructor is one of the loudest, angriest voices on social media. I have reams of tweets that were written by her. She is constantly attacking anyone who hasn’t sipped the Kool-aid. Maybe Juan should bring this up in court. Actually, once I am done here I think I will send him off an email. He doesn’t use social media so it might not cross his mind that the entire defense team does. Things to ponder.
Because we all know that I don’t ever do anything without proof I present exhibit A.
Please Take note that in this first Screen Shot Cha Cha makes it perfectly clear that she does indeed work on the case.
In this second post we see that Cha Cha gets her back up very easily when it is pointed out that a woman waaaaaay past her prime anyway managed to spell out cougarloucious instead of cougarlicious which was the intent. Apparently Cha Cha has a way overinflated sense of self. Wait…This is starting to sound vaguely familiar.
In post 3 we see that Cha Cha cannot take any type of criticism.
Post 4 is interesting.
Post 5 shows that Cha Cha seems to be very thin skinned and combative.
Post 7 speaks volumes doesn’t it.
People that go to Walmart are also on the radar of her ire. She seems to hate anyone who doesn’t support her views on things.
Another seemingly combative tweet.
I would love to tell her that we intelligent people are winning but of course as public enemy number 1, I am blocked from her twitter.
She really has a thing for the less intelligent doesn’t she?
Now, this is not just some nobody that has no dog in this fight. This is Stabby’s mitigation specialist who is privy to all kinds of sensitive information regarding the goings on of the trial. She works for the defense team obviously. You know, the ones who are on a daily basis bitching about social media and how it is derailing the trial. Seems to me that Nurmi should maybe get a leash on his Mitigation specialist. Like yesterday. It’s not people who have no bearing on this case you need to be worried about Alfred E. It’s the people in your own camp that for whatever reason are also reaching for that 15 minutes of fame and boatloads of that murder money.
So, Stabby and the never ending trial. As is usual court started late. We finally know why though. It is Stabby’s daily cavity search that some poor bastard has to perform. Today they found One Whole Brown Sugar Cured Ham, 3 Christmas cd’s, a box of Frosted Flakes, and magazines in a folder marked Legal. Jenny from the Cell Block arrived lugging to large bags and immediate began talking with Alfred E and ChaCha.
Defense then got up and left the courtroom. Someone may have yelled free weed and we just didn’t hear it, or someone was offering really gaudy clothing from 1980 and they were trying to stop ChaCha from getting out there. As soon as everyone was back in the courtroom, Sometimes Judge Stephens called everyone up to the bench. Sidebar is over in record time and Great Nana Dr. Sexpert was once again on the stand for more of the never ending re-direct.
Alfred E doesn’t even get a chance to get the entire first question out of his mouth before a madder than he has ever been in the history of ever Juan has objected and brings us to sidebar number 2. Sidebar number 2 is over and Alfred E tries again. Are you here in any way to say Travis was a horrible monstrous person? Dr. Sexpert says no which pretty much throws the pedophile accusations directly out the window. Stabby must be thrilled. Nurms keeps going. Are you hear to say Travis got what he deserved? Juan snarls and exception and we have sidebar number 3. Back from sidebar Alfred E is trying to have a new exhibit introduced and of course the completely rabid pitbull objects and you guessed it we are now on number 4. Back from sidebar the exhibit is admitted and Nurms asks Great Nana Dr. Sexpert about it. Over the long weekend the 5 hour rant that was really a two hour conversation has now magically turned into a 6 hour rant. My head hurts already. BRB gotta take a Tylenol. Sidebar number 5 is called and the sometimes Judge mercifully calls a 10 minute recess.
After the break that we all wished would last till the old bat died of old age, Nurmi has great Nana Dr. Sexpert start reading text messages. Dr. Sexpert is using the text messages to turn the 2 hour conversation into a six hour rant. Juans objections are flying like machine gun bullets as Nurmi gets Great Nana to go over the exact same thing that she has been going over for the last billion days. If you hear the same lies over and over again they will somehow magically become truths. Aaaaaand suffering in silence just once again reared its ugly head except now they were both suffering in silence. Dr. Sexpert says that most children do not call their parents by their first names to which I say “unless even as a kid you don’t think the rules apply to you.”
Dr. Sexpert has now taken it upon herself to become Stabby’s cheerleader and tries to remind the jury of the non existent physical abuse that poor Stabby suffered at the hands of her parents. For the billionth time she states that she is not there to diagnose or treat anyone while she continues to diagnose EVERYONE.
Juan is back up and the vet took one look and peaced the fuck out. We have a loose Juan with no dart in him. This may not turn out well. Juan is now having Great Nana Dr. Sexpert read some emails that Nurmi must have missed, because he wouldn’t leave out anything that might paint Travis in a good light on purpose…Bwahahahahahahahahahaha
The more into it they get the more defensive Dr. Sexpert is becoming. She is very confused as to times and what she said and didn’t say and of course she is blaming the state saying that they are misrepresenting her earlier testimony. It is in regards to her statement about the five hour rant that was a 2 hour text conversation that is now a 6 hour rant that she says she never said. Now she says that it has been taken out of context. With that the pitbull leaves Dr. Sexpert to pick her entrails up off the floor and try and put them back. And it’s lunch.
Court has reconvened and the Juror Questions are up. The first question was “was the sex with Miss Reid the same as the sex with Stabby. Dr. Sexpert says no, the sex with Stabby was more exploratory. The Jury then asks if Chris and Sky Hughes’ opinions could have changed between the time they wrote the email & the death. Dr. Sexpert conceded that it was likely. The Jury asks a couple more questions and Alfred E. is back up.